🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.