🔗 Share this article

As dawn crept over the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, representatives remained trapped in a enclosed conference room, oblivious whether it was day or night. They had been 12 hours in difficult discussions, with numerous ministers representing various coalitions of countries from the least developed nations to the wealthiest economies.

Patience wore thin, the air stifling as weary delegates faced up to the grim reality: they would not reach a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The latest global climate summit faced the brink of complete breakdown.

The central impasse: Fossil fuels

Scientific evidence has shown for nearly a century, the carbon dioxide produced by burning fossil fuels is warming our planet to critical levels.

However, during nearly three decades of annual climate meetings, the essential necessity to halt fossil fuel use has been mentioned only once – in a resolution made two years ago at previous UN climate talks to "transition away from fossil fuels". Delegates from the Gulf states, Russia, and multiple other countries were determined this would not occur another time.

Growing momentum for change

At the same time, a growing number of countries were equally determined that movement on this issue was urgently necessary. They had developed a initiative that was gathering expanding support and made it evident they were willing to hold firm.

Developing countries urgently needed to advance on securing funding support to help them address the already disastrous impacts of climate disasters.

Breaking point

During the night of Saturday, some delegates were ready to withdraw and cause breakdown. "We were close for us," commented one national delegate. "I was ready to walk away."

The breakthrough occurred through negotiations with Saudi Arabia. Shortly after 6am, key negotiators left the main group to hold a closed-door meeting with the chief Saudi negotiator. They encouraged text that would obliquely recognise the global commitment to "move beyond fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unexpected agreement

As opposed to explicitly namechecking fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the UAE consensus". Following reflection, the Saudi delegation surprisingly accepted the wording.

Participants showed visible relief. Cheers erupted. The deal was finalized.

With what became known as the "Brazil agreement", the world took another small step towards the systematic reduction of fossil fuels – a hesitant, limited step that will minimally impact the climate's ongoing trajectory towards disaster. But nevertheless a important shift from absolute paralysis.

Major components of the agreement

• Complementing the subtle acknowledgment in the formal agreement, countries will commence creating a framework to systematically reduce fossil fuels
• This will be largely a optional undertaking led by Brazil that will provide updates next year
• Addressing the essential decreases in greenhouse gas emissions to not exceed the 1.5C limit was likewise deferred to next year
• Developing countries achieved a threefold increase to $120bn of regular financial support to help them manage the impacts of extreme weather
• This sum will not be completely provided until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "equitable change process" to help people working in high-carbon industries shift to the renewable industry

Varied responses

As the world hovers near the brink of climate "tipping points" that could eliminate habitats and force whole regions into chaos, the agreement was far from the "major breakthrough" needed.

"Negotiators delivered some modest progress in the proper course, but given the scale of the climate crisis, it has not met the occasion," warned one environmental analyst.

This imperfect deal might have been all that was possible, given the political challenges – including a US president who shunned the talks and remains wedded to oil and coal, the growing influence of conservative movements, persistent fighting in multiple regions, intolerable levels of inequality, and global economic volatility.

"The climate arsonists – the energy conglomerates – were ultimately in the spotlight at the climate summit," comments one policy convener. "There is no turning back on that. The opportunity is available. Now we must turn it into a real fire escape to a more secure planet."

Significant divisions revealed

Even as nations were able to welcome the official adoption of the deal, Cop30 also highlighted significant divisions in the sole international mechanism for addressing the climate crisis.

"Climate conferences are unanimity-required, and in a time of global disagreements, consensus is increasingly difficult to reach," observed one international diplomat. "I cannot pretend that Cop30 has delivered everything that is needed. The difference between where we are and what research requires remains dangerously wide."

When the world is to avert the gravest consequences of climate crisis, the global discussions alone will fall far short.